Abstract: We use
a prospective randomized trial to
assess the impact of two school feeding schemes on
educational and health outcomes of children from low income household
in
northern rural Burkina Faso.
The school feeding programs
under consideration are school meals where students are provided with lunch each school
day, and take home rations which provide students with 10 kg of cereal flour each month,
conditional on 90 percent attendance rate. After the program ran for
one academic year, we found that both school feeding schemes increased
girls’
enrollment by 6 percent.While we did not
observe
any significant impact on raw scores on mathematics, weobservedthatthetime-adjustedscoresonmathematicsimprovedslightlyforgirls.An unexpected lower average attendance was observed.We argue that this reflects the absence of an
active labor market and the fact that households are
labor constrained and/or child labor is complementary
to adult labor.We show that the
interventions caused
attendance to decrease in
household who are low in child labor supply while
attendance improved for households which have a
relatively large child labor supply, consistent with the labor
constraints.This, in turn, explains the mixed impacts on
learning
outcomes that we observed. Finally, for younger siblings of beneficiaries, aged between 12 and
60 months who were not in school, take home rations have increased weight-for-age by .38
standard deviations and weight-for-height by .33 standard deviations.In contrast, school
meals did not have any
significant impact on the nutrition of younger children.
Abstract:
There is a large literature which explores how negative income
shocks impact human capital accumulation (especially education) when
financial markets are incomplete and households can neither insure nor
borrow to smooth their consumption. The main conclusion is that
households in these circumstances allocate child time to more labor and
to less schooling. Such ex-post use of child time as a self insurance
mechanism translates into lower human capital (lower years of education
completed) over time which is detrimental to economic growth. There has
been, however, little research on the cumulative effects of (perceived)
income uncertainty on child education. The intuition is that households
that face more a volatile income stream have greater incentives to
build up a buffer stock to insure against unforeseen adverse shocks,
and non enrollment can be part of such strategy. This paper fills this
gap on the literature which focuses on income shocks and education in
developing countries. The empirical work uses data from rural Burkina
Faso, an environment where school enrollment rates are low and
households face frequent income shocks. Controlling for current
economic shocks, household wealth levels and child characteristics, I
find that income uncertainty (expressed as income variance)
consistently reduces a number of education outcomes, including current
enrollment status, education expenditures per child, the number of
years of education completed and the probability of having been ever
enrolled. The estimation results suggest that income uncertainty might
have large welfare costs in terms of human capital.
The
Intra-Household Economics of
Polygyny:
Fertility and Child Health in Rural Mali (with Stefan Klonner) Abstract: Abstract: Building on anthropological
evidence, we
develop a model of intra-household decision making on fertility and
child survival within the framework of the collective household model.
We carry out a test of the implications of this framework with data
from Demographic and Health Surveys in rural Mali, where polygyny rates
among married women are close to 50 per cent. The econometric tests
reject the implications of efficient intrahousehold allocations for
junior wives in bigynous households and fail to reject for senior wives
in bigynous households as well as for wives in monogamous households.
These findings are consistent with existent narrative evidence
according to which co-wife rivalry is responsible for
resource-consuming struggle and junior wives are the adults with the
weakest bargaining position in the household.
Economic
Role
of
Children and the Demand for
Wives: Evidence from Burkina Faso (with Nistha Sinha) Abstract: This paper uses data
from
rural Burkina Faso
to probe the links between the
economic contribution
of children in low income economies and men’s fertility preference, and
to show
how men’s demand for children determines the number of wives a man
marries. The
empirical results indicate that men demand more children in areas where
child
productivity is high, which in turn induce men to take more than one
wife.
Conditional on our identification strategy, our findings have three
caveats.
First, they broaden the analysis of determinants of polygyny, providing
some
explanation to the variation in number of wives within a relatively
homogenous
agricultural system where variation in female productivity may be
limited.
Second, the results show the important role of men in areas where
polygyny is
practiced. Third, the results imply that policies that provide old age
security, discourage child labor or encourage schooling may reduce the
occurrence of polygyny.
Gender, Social Norms and Household
Production in Burkina Faso (with Zaki
Wahhaj) Using a survey of agricultural
households in Burkina Faso, we provide
evidence that plots owned by the head of the household are farmed much
more intensively than plots, with similar characteristics and planted
to the same crops, owned by other household members (of both genders).
As in previous studies, this evidence is inconsistent with the
assumption of Pareto efficiency in household decisions, but
additionally suggests that status within the household rather than
gender per se may be the most important factor in determining the
allocation of productive resources within the household. We argue that
the higher yields achieved by the household head may be explained in
terms of social norms that require him to spend the earnings from some
farms under his control exclusively on household public goods, as has
been observed in the anthropological literature on this region. We
provide evidence using expenditures data that, holding everything else
constant, household head spend relatively more on household public
goods than on their private goods.